Traditional astrology, nothing modern invented
From head to feet, every region has a ruler, a temperament and a regimen. The Health Map calculates yours across five factors and returns the chapters the sources support — never a list of twelve signs that is the same for everyone.
More than 2,800 charts generated
Traditional astrology · One-off payment · 7-day guarantee
Not an illustration and not a mockup: it is the page printed in your report, with the twelve regions named. In yours, the regions your chart accentuates come out in gold and the rest in light outline — because the page also says what your chart does not accentuate.
In gold, the regions the chart accentuates. The others are governed too — every sign has a ruler — but no significator points to them.
We generated the report for an illustrative birth date. The pages are the real output of the product — it is the chart that belongs to no one.
EnlargeThe chart wheel and the four sources named at the foot.
EnlargeNamed after the region, not the sign. Every citation carries author, work and year.
EnlargeThe five factors measured, with each axis against the median.
EnlargeEach food with the degree the tradition gave it — and what the fourth degree means.
No image is a mockup. Every page is the real output of the product.
The report does not invent a chapter to fill a page.
From 1 to 5 region chapters — and which ones you get is not our choice. Four significators of your birth vote; where two or more point at the same region, the chapter is born. That is why no two reports share an index.
The average is 1.62 chapters. A dispersed chart does not make a worse report — it makes a different finding, and that finding is written down.
The method
One says where to look. The other says what to do. They are independent — and when one falls silent, that silence is a result too.
Four voices in your chart point to regions through Lilly's table: the lord of the Ascendant, the Moon, the lord of the sixth house and the sign on the sixth itself — a clause almost nobody uses. Where two or more agree there is concentration; Lilly writes that there the judgement becomes "more certain, and I dare say infallible". Where they do not agree, the report says so, because dispersion is a finding and not a gap.
Your temperament comes out of five factors, and the margin of each axis is compared against the median of a measured population. The excess belongs to the axis, never to the temperament: nobody is "excessively phlegmatic" — someone is pronounced in cold, or in moist, and the two travel apart. An axis at the median is maintained by the like; a pronounced axis is corrected by the contrary, matching in degree.
Where each sentence comes from
No sentence in the report comes from "the tradition says". Every citation is verbatim, with author, work and year — in the spelling of 1647.
William Lilly, Christian Astrology (London, 1647)
The planet-in-sign → member of the body table, transcribed by hand from two facsimiles. It is two pages, not one: almost everyone who cites it uses half.
Nicholas Culpeper, The Complete Herbal (1653)
The only author with planet, quality and DEGREE in the same entry. The regimen comes from him — and he is also the one who rejects Lilly's table by name, with a clinical counterexample.
Thomas Elyot (1539) and Thomas Cogan (1584)
The rule of the like and the contrary, and the stopping rule for exercise. The tradition speaks of intensity, duration, hour and season — never of modality.
Firmicus Maternus, in the fourth century, gives the heart to Cancer — the reverse of what sounds obvious today. Manilius gives flanks and shoulder blades to Leo and gives the heart to no sign at all. "Leo governs the heart" is Lilly and Culpeper, not "the tradition". Four of the twelve lines diverge, and that is why the report names every source instead of saying "the tradition says".
Annex
This table is the same for every reader, and the page says so: it is the method, not the reading. What changes from person to person is what the calculation does with it.
A chart with three converging regions yields more pages than a dispersed one — and the dispersed one is not a worse report, it is a different finding. We would rather have a report that follows your chart than a fixed page count that forces padding.
Name, date, time and place of birth — exactly as for any birth chart.
Convergence, table cells, dignities, sect, reception, axis margins and the degree of every food come out of the calculation. The prose never picks an author and never invents a degree.
Within minutes the report reaches your inbox, in digital form to read on your phone or computer, with the appendix of the twelve parts and the verbatim citations from every source.
A symbolic document about a sixteenth- and seventeenth-century tradition: what Lilly, Culpeper, Elyot and Cogan wrote, applied to your natal chart. It is not professional guidance, it replaces none, and it promises no outcome of any kind. The report repeats this on its own back cover.
It would be, if it made things up. Here every sentence carries an author, a work and a year — you read what Lilly wrote in 1647, not what we think in 2026.
It happens to roughly one chart in eight, and the report says so in plain words. Dispersion is a finding, not a failure — and you still receive temperament, regimen and appendices.
It is three books run against your chart, with page and year in every sentence. A facsimile of Christian Astrology alone costs more than this — and it does not come calculated for your birth.
Seven days, no questions. It is digital: you will have read all of it by the time you ask — and we still refund you.
$9.90, once. It is not a summary of what those books say — it is what they say about your chart, with page and year.
Launch offer
One-off payment. No subscription and no renewal.
7-day guarantee. If the report does not make sense to you, we refund you.
To close
Four voices read your chart. Where two agree, a chapter is born. Where none agree, the page says so — instead of padding it out with sign clichés.
One-off payment · in your inbox in minutes
